<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nyquist Capital &#187; HIT</title>
	<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com</link>
	<description>More Signal. Less Noise.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The Future of FTTH in China - Part II</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nyquistcapital.com%2F2006%2F06%2F06%2Fthe-future-of-ftth-in-china-part-ii%2F&amp;seed_title=The+Future+of+FTTH+in+China+-+Part+II</link>
		<comments>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nyquistcapital.com%2F2006%2F06%2F06%2Fthe-future-of-ftth-in-china-part-ii%2F&amp;seed_title=The+Future+of+FTTH+in+China+-+Part+II#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 16:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Schmitt</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Carriers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Components]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Equipment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[FTTH]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ALA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CHT]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[HANAD]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[HIT]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[KTC]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MOT]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NTT]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[TLAB]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[VZ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2006/06/06/the-future-of-ftth-in-china-part-ii/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is part II in a continuing series. Part I can be found here.
Technology Selection â€“ GE-PON vs. G-PON
Chinese carriers will be forced to select between two competing standards for Passive Optical Networks (PON) for Fiber to the Home (FTTH) Deployments.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is part II in a continuing series. Part I can be found <a href="http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2006/05/30/the-future-of-ftth-in-china-part-i/">here</a>.</em></p>
<p><strong>Technology Selection â€“ GE-PON vs. G-PON</strong></p>
<p>Chinese carriers will be forced to select between two competing standards for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive_Optical_Network">Passive Optical Networks</a> (PON) for Fiber to the Home (FTTH) Deployments.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.nyquistcapital.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nyquistcapital.com%2F2006%2F06%2F06%2Fthe-future-of-ftth-in-china-part-ii%2F&amp;seed_title=The+Future+of+FTTH+in+China+-+Part+II#more-363" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nyquistcapital.com%2F2006%2F06%2F06%2Fthe-future-of-ftth-in-china-part-ii%2F&amp;seed_title=The+Future+of+FTTH+in+China+-+Part+II/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
