<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10GbE and SFP+ &#8211; This Time It&#8217;s Different</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/28/10gbe-and-sfp-this-time-its-different/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/28/10gbe-and-sfp-this-time-its-different/</link>
	<description>More Signal. Less Noise.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:29:57 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/28/10gbe-and-sfp-this-time-its-different/#comment-1652</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/28/10gbe-and-sfp-this-time-its-different/#comment-1652</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve missed the bigger picture with regard to EDC.  EDC will become a check mark on the 10G PHY check list.  If the PHY does not have it, it won&#039;t make it onto the board.  With both SFP+ LRM and SFP+ copper support being mandatory, EDC is a requirement.  The PHYs are becoming commoditized, eventually there will only be PHYs with EDC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve missed the bigger picture with regard to EDC.  EDC will become a check mark on the 10G PHY check list.  If the PHY does not have it, it won&#8217;t make it onto the board.  With both SFP+ LRM and SFP+ copper support being mandatory, EDC is a requirement.  The PHYs are becoming commoditized, eventually there will only be PHYs with EDC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Schmitt</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/28/10gbe-and-sfp-this-time-its-different/#comment-1649</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Schmitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/28/10gbe-and-sfp-this-time-its-different/#comment-1649</guid>
		<description>My comment was directed at Aeleros/Netlogic and the comment about their chip.

I believe cisco will de-emphasize LRM based SFP+. I bet almost all the volume will be SR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My comment was directed at Aeleros/Netlogic and the comment about their chip.</p>
<p>I believe cisco will de-emphasize LRM based SFP+. I bet almost all the volume will be SR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar Sultan</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/28/10gbe-and-sfp-this-time-its-different/#comment-1648</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Sultan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/28/10gbe-and-sfp-this-time-its-different/#comment-1648</guid>
		<description>Ciscoguy:

Nothing is carved in stone right now--we are exploring the options moving forward and seeing what customers want and what makes sense.

Andrew:

I am not sure what your question is--are you saying we have not been successful with SFP+?  Could you expound a bit?

Omar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ciscoguy:</p>
<p>Nothing is carved in stone right now&#8211;we are exploring the options moving forward and seeing what customers want and what makes sense.</p>
<p>Andrew:</p>
<p>I am not sure what your question is&#8211;are you saying we have not been successful with SFP+?  Could you expound a bit?</p>
<p>Omar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar Sultan</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/28/10gbe-and-sfp-this-time-its-different/#comment-1651</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Sultan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/28/10gbe-and-sfp-this-time-its-different/#comment-1651</guid>
		<description>Just a quick point of clarification:  the 10GbE I/O modules for the Nexus 7000 use SPF+:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps9441/ps9402/ps9512/Data_Sheet_C78-437757.html

The platform and modules are currently orderable and we will begin shipping in calendar Q2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick point of clarification:  the 10GbE I/O modules for the Nexus 7000 use SPF+:<br />
<a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps9441/ps9402/ps9512/Data_Sheet_C78-437757.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps9441/ps9402/ps9512/Data_Sheet_C78-437757.html</a></p>
<p>The platform and modules are currently orderable and we will begin shipping in calendar Q2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ciscoguy</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/28/10gbe-and-sfp-this-time-its-different/#comment-1650</link>
		<dc:creator>ciscoguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/28/10gbe-and-sfp-this-time-its-different/#comment-1650</guid>
		<description>My Question is that, why they seem not interested in 10G Base T ? Even new cisco nexus is not supporting this interface

http://www.goccie.info/cisco-data-centre-10gbaset-nexus-7000/cisco-data-centre-10gbaset-nexus-7000.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Question is that, why they seem not interested in 10G Base T ? Even new cisco nexus is not supporting this interface</p>
<p><a href="http://www.goccie.info/cisco-data-centre-10gbaset-nexus-7000/cisco-data-centre-10gbaset-nexus-7000.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.goccie.info/cisco-data-centre-10gbaset-nexus-7000/cisco-data-centre-10gbaset-nexus-7000.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10GBase-T Musings &#171; Iain&#8217;s Chips &#38; Tech</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/28/10gbe-and-sfp-this-time-its-different/#comment-1647</link>
		<dc:creator>10GBase-T Musings &#171; Iain&#8217;s Chips &#38; Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/28/10gbe-and-sfp-this-time-its-different/#comment-1647</guid>
		<description>[...] much power dissipation (Pd) - Andrew@Nyquist estimates that offerings in 2011 will have manageable power. Linley wire concurs ( see [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] much power dissipation (Pd) &#8211; Andrew@Nyquist estimates that offerings in 2011 will have manageable power. Linley wire concurs ( see [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Schmitt</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/28/10gbe-and-sfp-this-time-its-different/#comment-1646</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Schmitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/28/10gbe-and-sfp-this-time-its-different/#comment-1646</guid>
		<description>Yes, I am aware of the product. My argument was that you haven&#039;t been successful with it.

Where is the product designed in?

It is always good to see vendors participating in the discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I am aware of the product. My argument was that you haven&#8217;t been successful with it.</p>
<p>Where is the product designed in?</p>
<p>It is always good to see vendors participating in the discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siddharth Sheth</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/28/10gbe-and-sfp-this-time-its-different/#comment-1645</link>
		<dc:creator>Siddharth Sheth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/28/10gbe-and-sfp-this-time-its-different/#comment-1645</guid>
		<description>Andrew,

Curious to know where you got your info that Aeluros / Netlogic does not have an integrated EDC XAUI PHY?

Care to check this release?

http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;STORY=/www/story/03-01-2006/0004310839&amp;EDATE=</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,</p>
<p>Curious to know where you got your info that Aeluros / Netlogic does not have an integrated EDC XAUI PHY?</p>
<p>Care to check this release?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;STORY=/www/story/03-01-2006/0004310839&amp;EDATE=" rel="nofollow">http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;STORY=/www/story/03-01-2006/0004310839&amp;EDATE=</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FC</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/28/10gbe-and-sfp-this-time-its-different/#comment-1644</link>
		<dc:creator>FC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 06:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/28/10gbe-and-sfp-this-time-its-different/#comment-1644</guid>
		<description>Good analysis and interesting points.

Cannot agree more on the GbE ports. Also 10ge optics enjoy 10G port dominance for at least 3-4yrs window of oppty.

Datacenter capital expenditure could be initial driver by the use of 10ge, but miss the point it&#039;s video content which will keep driving its capacity growth in access. I felt this during my asian trip.

I personally love to see SFP+ rising, but feel alot
overoptimistic. Is SFP+ pricing not going to be brutal without Cisco dominance? Also depending on how one mean by edc, its still enabling factor to close the jitter budget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good analysis and interesting points.</p>
<p>Cannot agree more on the GbE ports. Also 10ge optics enjoy 10G port dominance for at least 3-4yrs window of oppty.</p>
<p>Datacenter capital expenditure could be initial driver by the use of 10ge, but miss the point it&#8217;s video content which will keep driving its capacity growth in access. I felt this during my asian trip.</p>
<p>I personally love to see SFP+ rising, but feel alot<br />
overoptimistic. Is SFP+ pricing not going to be brutal without Cisco dominance? Also depending on how one mean by edc, its still enabling factor to close the jitter budget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iain Verigin</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/28/10gbe-and-sfp-this-time-its-different/#comment-1643</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain Verigin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 04:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/28/10gbe-and-sfp-this-time-its-different/#comment-1643</guid>
		<description>* good stuff.
* for some reason I&#039;m still in the &quot;This time is not different camp&quot;
  -- more of an emotional call than based on the &quot;reality&quot; that you present.
* betting against X-Base-T in the datacenter has never been a good plan.  It may be deferred, but  it will happen.
* The analog gods ( or firmware gods ) always seem to deliver miracles ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* good stuff.<br />
* for some reason I&#8217;m still in the &#8220;This time is not different camp&#8221;<br />
  &#8212; more of an emotional call than based on the &#8220;reality&#8221; that you present.<br />
* betting against X-Base-T in the datacenter has never been a good plan.  It may be deferred, but  it will happen.<br />
* The analog gods ( or firmware gods ) always seem to deliver miracles ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
