<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: State of the Photon &#8211; Global FTTH Activity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/05/31/state-of-the-photon-global-ftth-activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/05/31/state-of-the-photon-global-ftth-activity/</link>
	<description>More Signal. Less Noise.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:29:57 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Francois Menard</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/05/31/state-of-the-photon-global-ftth-activity/#comment-1314</link>
		<dc:creator>Francois Menard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 20:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/05/31/state-of-the-photon-global-ftth-activity/#comment-1314</guid>
		<description>In Quebec, we&#039;ve been delploying Allied Telesis GE-PON with great success.  There is no point to pay the G-PON premium IMHO at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Quebec, we&#8217;ve been delploying Allied Telesis GE-PON with great success.  There is no point to pay the G-PON premium IMHO at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FTTHblog &#187; Summary of Global FTTH Activity</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/05/31/state-of-the-photon-global-ftth-activity/#comment-1318</link>
		<dc:creator>FTTHblog &#187; Summary of Global FTTH Activity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/05/31/state-of-the-photon-global-ftth-activity/#comment-1318</guid>
		<description>[...] Schmitt gives a chip and platform centric summary of global FTTH activity. GE-PON is strong in Asia and GPON is strong elsewhere. However, GE-PON [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Schmitt gives a chip and platform centric summary of global FTTH activity. GE-PON is strong in Asia and GPON is strong elsewhere. However, GE-PON [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohit Sharma</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/05/31/state-of-the-photon-global-ftth-activity/#comment-1320</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohit Sharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/05/31/state-of-the-photon-global-ftth-activity/#comment-1320</guid>
		<description>Andrew,

 It would be useful to understand the cost per Mbps delivered to the subscriber across GE-PON and GPON/BPON deployments.  If someone can come up with better than speciality LD/SOA and packaging that Novera is doing, WDM-PON may very well prove in if cheaper bandwidth &gt; 10Mbps is required (cheaper than GPON).  XDSL should be in the tens of $ range per Mbps and xPONs in the few dollars range.  Can WDM-PON come in at tens of cents per Mbps?

Rohit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,</p>
<p> It would be useful to understand the cost per Mbps delivered to the subscriber across GE-PON and GPON/BPON deployments.  If someone can come up with better than speciality LD/SOA and packaging that Novera is doing, WDM-PON may very well prove in if cheaper bandwidth &gt; 10Mbps is required (cheaper than GPON).  XDSL should be in the tens of $ range per Mbps and xPONs in the few dollars range.  Can WDM-PON come in at tens of cents per Mbps?</p>
<p>Rohit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Badger</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/05/31/state-of-the-photon-global-ftth-activity/#comment-1319</link>
		<dc:creator>John Badger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/05/31/state-of-the-photon-global-ftth-activity/#comment-1319</guid>
		<description>The reason people think BT are not rolling out any FTTH is a botched press release where BT said &quot;we are not rolling out FTTH...&quot; and forgot to add &quot;...except for Greenfield sites&quot;

See link for first limited deployment.

http://www.ispreview.co.uk/cgi-bin/news/viewnews.cgi?id=EEZpAkyFEAUppxEIhr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason people think BT are not rolling out any FTTH is a botched press release where BT said &#8220;we are not rolling out FTTH&#8230;&#8221; and forgot to add &#8220;&#8230;except for Greenfield sites&#8221;</p>
<p>See link for first limited deployment.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ispreview.co.uk/cgi-bin/news/viewnews.cgi?id=EEZpAkyFEAUppxEIhr" rel="nofollow">http://www.ispreview.co.uk/cgi-bin/news/viewnews.cgi?id=EEZpAkyFEAUppxEIhr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeno Davatz</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/05/31/state-of-the-photon-global-ftth-activity/#comment-1315</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeno Davatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 10:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/05/31/state-of-the-photon-global-ftth-activity/#comment-1315</guid>
		<description>Japan sure is ahead in terms of Fiber. In Japan you pay about half the price for a broadband connection in comparison with Switzerland.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Japan sure is ahead in terms of Fiber. In Japan you pay about half the price for a broadband connection in comparison with Switzerland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GigaOM Little Slovenia, part of the Big Fiber Dream &#171;</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/05/31/state-of-the-photon-global-ftth-activity/#comment-1317</link>
		<dc:creator>GigaOM Little Slovenia, part of the Big Fiber Dream &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 07:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/05/31/state-of-the-photon-global-ftth-activity/#comment-1317</guid>
		<description>[...] According to UBS Research, there will be between 1 and 1.3 million fiber homes by end of 2007, and by 2012 this number could hit 10 million. In comparison, US will have 18 million and Japan will have 30 million fiber-connected homes. (Andrew Schmitt has compiled a nice state of the FTTH report.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] According to UBS Research, there will be between 1 and 1.3 million fiber homes by end of 2007, and by 2012 this number could hit 10 million. In comparison, US will have 18 million and Japan will have 30 million fiber-connected homes. (Andrew Schmitt has compiled a nice state of the FTTH report.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sajith</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/05/31/state-of-the-photon-global-ftth-activity/#comment-1316</link>
		<dc:creator>Sajith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 02:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/05/31/state-of-the-photon-global-ftth-activity/#comment-1316</guid>
		<description>Andrew, Is GPON/BPON/GE-PON very relevant? I saw this diagram on Brough Turner&#039;s blog on the FTTH elements - http://blogs.nmss.com/communications/2007/05/useful_life_of_.html. Will this allow operators to move to more mature/ cheaper standards over time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, Is GPON/BPON/GE-PON very relevant? I saw this diagram on Brough Turner&#8217;s blog on the FTTH elements &#8211; <a href="http://blogs.nmss.com/communications/2007/05/useful_life_of_.html" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.nmss.com/communications/2007/05/useful_life_of_.html</a>. Will this allow operators to move to more mature/ cheaper standards over time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
