<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vitesse Q107 Conference Call Notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/03/15/vitesse-q107-conference-call-notes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/03/15/vitesse-q107-conference-call-notes/</link>
	<description>More Signal. Less Noise.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:29:57 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Schmitt</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/03/15/vitesse-q107-conference-call-notes/#comment-1111</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Schmitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/03/15/vitesse-q107-conference-call-notes/#comment-1111</guid>
		<description>I am not too concerned about it. As I have written before, my interest in the company is based on the value of the underlying assets. Vitesse networking products are an annuity that will pay dividends for many years. I prefer not to drive myself crazy worrying about next quarters revenue.

I am more concerned about inventory management. If networking revenue was down 10% but they burned off $5M of inventory (and gained cash) in the process it would be a net win. If the softness in networking grows inventory then I am very worried.

The metrics by which I think Vitesse should be judged are cash management, protecting the integrity of the existing business, and exploring strategic divestitures/combinations that would extract more value from them. I am not concerned about fluctuations in their end markets.

The fact that we see volatility now is a good sign that distribution is no longer buffering results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not too concerned about it. As I have written before, my interest in the company is based on the value of the underlying assets. Vitesse networking products are an annuity that will pay dividends for many years. I prefer not to drive myself crazy worrying about next quarters revenue.</p>
<p>I am more concerned about inventory management. If networking revenue was down 10% but they burned off $5M of inventory (and gained cash) in the process it would be a net win. If the softness in networking grows inventory then I am very worried.</p>
<p>The metrics by which I think Vitesse should be judged are cash management, protecting the integrity of the existing business, and exploring strategic divestitures/combinations that would extract more value from them. I am not concerned about fluctuations in their end markets.</p>
<p>The fact that we see volatility now is a good sign that distribution is no longer buffering results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/03/15/vitesse-q107-conference-call-notes/#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 18:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/03/15/vitesse-q107-conference-call-notes/#comment-1112</guid>
		<description>Andrew, I really appreciate your insights into the Vitesse situation.

Regarding your comment &quot;Opex cut radically from 33M to 28M.&quot; The actual statement on the call was &quot;Operating expenses which are net of professional fees and depreciation stayed flat at approximately 28 million dollars.&quot;  I think Vitesse management misreported their Op Ex number on the November call and the $33M number they quoted in Nov. included the professional fees, I don&#039;t know why else they&#039;d refer to their December quarter Op Ex figure as remaining flat at $28M.

Given it&#039;s half their business, how concerned are you about the comment Chris made in the last call regarding the softness they are now seeing in the networking segment?  I believe his comment was &quot;Consistent with our competitors, we have seen a softening in the end market here (networking) and we do expect this softness to continue somewhat into future quarters.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, I really appreciate your insights into the Vitesse situation.</p>
<p>Regarding your comment &#8220;Opex cut radically from 33M to 28M.&#8221; The actual statement on the call was &#8220;Operating expenses which are net of professional fees and depreciation stayed flat at approximately 28 million dollars.&#8221;  I think Vitesse management misreported their Op Ex number on the November call and the $33M number they quoted in Nov. included the professional fees, I don&#8217;t know why else they&#8217;d refer to their December quarter Op Ex figure as remaining flat at $28M.</p>
<p>Given it&#8217;s half their business, how concerned are you about the comment Chris made in the last call regarding the softness they are now seeing in the networking segment?  I believe his comment was &#8220;Consistent with our competitors, we have seen a softening in the end market here (networking) and we do expect this softness to continue somewhat into future quarters.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m@</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/03/15/vitesse-q107-conference-call-notes/#comment-1115</link>
		<dc:creator>m@</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/03/15/vitesse-q107-conference-call-notes/#comment-1115</guid>
		<description>the cash situation seems really scary even if they can reduce the majority of the 5m spent last quarter on profs. they could be under 10m by this point in the quarter. any guess how low that 16m will get during the quarter as the cash ebbs and flows?

also seems like crg is really playing up selling ethernet to the telcos.  at the end of the day, can they rationalize the ethernet business without winning more sockets at csco?

at any rate, it was good to hear that things were picking up and hitachi and hp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the cash situation seems really scary even if they can reduce the majority of the 5m spent last quarter on profs. they could be under 10m by this point in the quarter. any guess how low that 16m will get during the quarter as the cash ebbs and flows?</p>
<p>also seems like crg is really playing up selling ethernet to the telcos.  at the end of the day, can they rationalize the ethernet business without winning more sockets at csco?</p>
<p>at any rate, it was good to hear that things were picking up and hitachi and hp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Schmitt</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/03/15/vitesse-q107-conference-call-notes/#comment-1114</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Schmitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/03/15/vitesse-q107-conference-call-notes/#comment-1114</guid>
		<description>They have a &#039;carve out&#039; with Tennebaum. This is not a loan or line of credit. This allows them to solicit funding up to $25M from another source without changing the T-Baum loan terms.

The Yakuza would offer better terms at this point than the existing T-Baum loan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have a &#8216;carve out&#8217; with Tennebaum. This is not a loan or line of credit. This allows them to solicit funding up to $25M from another source without changing the T-Baum loan terms.</p>
<p>The Yakuza would offer better terms at this point than the existing T-Baum loan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: punci</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/03/15/vitesse-q107-conference-call-notes/#comment-1116</link>
		<dc:creator>punci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/03/15/vitesse-q107-conference-call-notes/#comment-1116</guid>
		<description>They mentioned that they had a $25M line of credit from Tannenbaum.  Any understanding of what the terms are if they draw that down?  Or would another financing option offer better terms?  What is the worse case financing option in your opinion?

It surprises me why they need to give a range for consumption.  I know semi companies 5X VTSS size that know exactly what sales-out are on a daily basis - so why doesn&#039;t VTSS know 2 months after quarter close.  It surprises me that a 20 yr company does not have these systems in place already.

I agree that the professional service fees are criminal.  If I were being paid that sum, I certainly would take my time.  The problem is that if they reduce those fees and hire an auditor, I can image that the audit fees will be equally criminal.

Finally, I don&#039;t share your optimism on a flat quarter.  It seemed that they mentioned SAS products would be down as well as core networking - unless I heard something wrong.

Thanks for the good analysis and look forward to your responses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They mentioned that they had a $25M line of credit from Tannenbaum.  Any understanding of what the terms are if they draw that down?  Or would another financing option offer better terms?  What is the worse case financing option in your opinion?</p>
<p>It surprises me why they need to give a range for consumption.  I know semi companies 5X VTSS size that know exactly what sales-out are on a daily basis &#8211; so why doesn&#8217;t VTSS know 2 months after quarter close.  It surprises me that a 20 yr company does not have these systems in place already.</p>
<p>I agree that the professional service fees are criminal.  If I were being paid that sum, I certainly would take my time.  The problem is that if they reduce those fees and hire an auditor, I can image that the audit fees will be equally criminal.</p>
<p>Finally, I don&#8217;t share your optimism on a flat quarter.  It seemed that they mentioned SAS products would be down as well as core networking &#8211; unless I heard something wrong.</p>
<p>Thanks for the good analysis and look forward to your responses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P Johnson (stockholder)</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/03/15/vitesse-q107-conference-call-notes/#comment-1113</link>
		<dc:creator>P Johnson (stockholder)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/03/15/vitesse-q107-conference-call-notes/#comment-1113</guid>
		<description>Good summary.  One question remains open.  Why does Tomasetta remain on the board?  I know our system is &#039; innocent until proven guilty&#039;, but the man must be smart enough to understand that he is currently a huge liability to the company, and to it&#039;s ability to regain some credibility in the investment community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good summary.  One question remains open.  Why does Tomasetta remain on the board?  I know our system is &#8216; innocent until proven guilty&#8217;, but the man must be smart enough to understand that he is currently a huge liability to the company, and to it&#8217;s ability to regain some credibility in the investment community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
