<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 802.11n is Not About the Speed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/01/19/80211n-is-not-about-the-speed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/01/19/80211n-is-not-about-the-speed/</link>
	<description>More Signal. Less Noise.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:29:57 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CES 2008 - Opinion and Perspective &#124; Nyquist Capital</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/01/19/80211n-is-not-about-the-speed/#comment-1004</link>
		<dc:creator>CES 2008 - Opinion and Perspective &#124; Nyquist Capital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/01/19/80211n-is-not-about-the-speed/#comment-1004</guid>
		<description>[...] strips ( with Ethernet RJ-45 jacks running over the power lines). As predicted last year (see &quot;802.11n is Not About the Speed&quot;), 802.11n went from prototype to mainstream technology in a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] strips ( with Ethernet RJ-45 jacks running over the power lines). As predicted last year (see &quot;802.11n is Not About the Speed&quot;), 802.11n went from prototype to mainstream technology in a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Lew</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/01/19/80211n-is-not-about-the-speed/#comment-1002</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Lew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 01:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/01/19/80211n-is-not-about-the-speed/#comment-1002</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, I believe that the 802.11n chipset vendors and the (consumer) equipment providers are only providing half of the story. While 802.11n DOES provide reduced interference between the client devices and endpoints when compared to a similar 802.11g or 802.11b setup due to the use of multiple antennas, 802.11n achieves greater speed through the use of a wider, double wide radio channel.

What this means in plain english is that introduction of an 802.11n access point is twice as likely to result in interference with existing 802.11b/g networks as introduction of an 802.11b/g access point. Furthermore, since there are only three non-overlapping radio channels, expect to see real-world performance in urban and up to 1/2 acren lot suburban settings to suffer significantly for everyone as the marketing machines of Linksys and their ilk drive up demand for 802.11n products.

IMHO, only those few consumers with high speed file / video transfer needs and uber-mansions of 5000  square feet will actually benefit from 802.11n technology. However, like the iPhone (see other blog entry), this isn&#039;t about need, is it? It&#039;s about creating demand and getting to consumer to scratch the itch called desire...


Albert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, I believe that the 802.11n chipset vendors and the (consumer) equipment providers are only providing half of the story. While 802.11n DOES provide reduced interference between the client devices and endpoints when compared to a similar 802.11g or 802.11b setup due to the use of multiple antennas, 802.11n achieves greater speed through the use of a wider, double wide radio channel.</p>
<p>What this means in plain english is that introduction of an 802.11n access point is twice as likely to result in interference with existing 802.11b/g networks as introduction of an 802.11b/g access point. Furthermore, since there are only three non-overlapping radio channels, expect to see real-world performance in urban and up to 1/2 acren lot suburban settings to suffer significantly for everyone as the marketing machines of Linksys and their ilk drive up demand for 802.11n products.</p>
<p>IMHO, only those few consumers with high speed file / video transfer needs and uber-mansions of 5000  square feet will actually benefit from 802.11n technology. However, like the iPhone (see other blog entry), this isn&#8217;t about need, is it? It&#8217;s about creating demand and getting to consumer to scratch the itch called desire&#8230;</p>
<p>Albert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CES 2007 Summary at Nyquist Capital</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/01/19/80211n-is-not-about-the-speed/#comment-1003</link>
		<dc:creator>CES 2007 Summary at Nyquist Capital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 22:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/01/19/80211n-is-not-about-the-speed/#comment-1003</guid>
		<description>[...] 802.11n is now prime time. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 802.11n is now prime time. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
