<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did PMC-Sierra Overpay?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2005/11/03/did-pmc-sierra-overpay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2005/11/03/did-pmc-sierra-overpay/</link>
	<description>More Signal. Less Noise.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:29:57 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vitesse Investment Thesis at Nyquist Capital</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2005/11/03/did-pmc-sierra-overpay/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Vitesse Investment Thesis at Nyquist Capital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nyquistcapital.com/?p=2#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] Storage - The most attractive unit for prospective M&amp;A. Generates $60M a year with 50% margins. PMC-Sierra&#160;paid 3.8x revenue for the storage semiconductor unit &#160;of Avago in Fall &#8216;05. Vitesse has products poised for a more significant product ramp than the ones acquired from Avago. An identical valuation&#160;of the Vitesse unit&#160;is conservative.&#160;Valuation $225M. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Storage &#8211; The most attractive unit for prospective M&amp;A. Generates $60M a year with 50% margins. PMC-Sierra&nbsp;paid 3.8x revenue for the storage semiconductor unit &nbsp;of Avago in Fall &#8216;05. Vitesse has products poised for a more significant product ramp than the ones acquired from Avago. An identical valuation&nbsp;of the Vitesse unit&nbsp;is conservative.&nbsp;Valuation $225M. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nyquist Capital - Thoughts on PMC-Sierra</title>
		<link>http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2005/11/03/did-pmc-sierra-overpay/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Nyquist Capital - Thoughts on PMC-Sierra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 16:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nyquistcapital.com/?p=2#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] I admired PMC-Sierra while working at Vitesse Semiconductor (VTSS). PMC has an excellent system/architecture based approach to design which sometimes worked in Telecom but is ideally suited to more commodity and standardized markets like storage. The first post I wrote for this blog was on PMC&#8217;s acquisition of Avago&#8217;s (Agilent component spinoff) storage semiconductor business. While the acquisition looked cheap from a financial perspective, I predicted it would create strategic and pricing challenges going forward. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I admired PMC-Sierra while working at Vitesse Semiconductor (VTSS). PMC has an excellent system/architecture based approach to design which sometimes worked in Telecom but is ideally suited to more commodity and standardized markets like storage. The first post I wrote for this blog was on PMC&#8217;s acquisition of Avago&#8217;s (Agilent component spinoff) storage semiconductor business. While the acquisition looked cheap from a financial perspective, I predicted it would create strategic and pricing challenges going forward. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
